I’m trying to create an AI headshot for my profile, but the results keep looking fake, blurry, or nothing like me. I uploaded a few photos and followed the basic steps, but I’m clearly missing something. I need help figuring out the best way to get a realistic AI headshot, including what photos to use, which settings matter, and how to improve the final image.
Making an AI headshot turned out to be easier than I expected. I didn’t touch Photoshop. I didn’t mess with editing apps. I uploaded photos, waited, then sorted through the results.
I used this iPhone app:
And this page:
Eltima AI Headshot Generator
How it worked for me was simple. I fed it a batch of selfies, and the tool built a face model from those. After that, it spat out a pile of headshots with different looks. Some were clean office-style shots. Some looked like studio portraits. A few leaned more business casual, which worked better for profile pages.
Here are a couple I got back:
The upload step matters more than people think. When I used bright photos with a plain background and a few angles, front, slight side turn, different expressions, the output looked better. When I tested darker selfies or older pics with filters, the face details got weird fast. Skin texture looked off. Eyes too.
Then it was mostly a waiting game. Once the set finished, I had a bunch of versions to skim through. Some were duds. A few had that polished fake look around the hairline or teeth. Still, I usually found several solid ones worth saving.
Other services do the same sort of thing. People bring up Aragon AI and HeadshotPro a lot. The flow is more or less identical. Upload your photos, let it render, keep the ones which don’t look off.
My take is pretty plain. For LinkedIn, resumes, freelance platforms, company bios, AI headshots are good enough most of the time. I’d rather spend a few minutes uploading selfies than book a whole shoot for one profile picture.
I still wouldn’t use one for press photos or anything tied to serious branding. If someone is going to zoom in, or if the image needs to hold up under scrutiny, a real photographer still does better work.
For a fast, clean professional image, though, this route worked fine for me.
2 Likes
Fake-looking AI headshots usually come from bad training photos, not the generator.
What helped me:
- Use 12 to 20 photos of your current face.
- No beauty filters, no sunglasses, no heavy makeup, no old pics.
- Keep lighting consistent. Window light beats dim indoor selfies.
- Mix angles a little, but keep most shots close to straight-on.
- Crop from chest up. Tiny face in a full-body pic gives blurry junk.
- Wear simple clothes in uploads. Loud patterns confuse things.
- Pick one style for output. If you ask for corporate, casual, studio, outdoor, all at once, the face drifts.
I sort of disagree with @mikeappsreviewer on one point. More variety is not always better. Too much variety makes some tools lose your face.
Also, skip images where you look 5 years younger. AI will mash them together and you get weird teeth, smeared skin, odd hairlines. Been there, lol.
If the app lets you adjust likeness strength, push likeness higher and stylization lower. That fixed it for me. If your results still look off after a better photo set, switch tools. Some models are flat out worse at faces.
You’re probably not failing at the tool. You’re asking it to do two jobs at once: match your face and create a polished portrait. A lot of generators are way better at the second part than the first.
I kinda disagree with @yozora on one thing though. It’s not always just “bad training photos” causing fake results. Sometimes the app’s model is simply too aggressive with beautifying. That’s why you get waxy skin, weird teeth, and that uncanny LinkedIn-core look.
What helped me was treating it like a casting process, not a one-shot upload.
- First, use photos from the same general time period
- Second, pick one “identity anchor” feature and protect it. Glasses, beard shape, smile lines, haircut, whatever actually makes you look like you
- Third, reject any generator that auto-smooths skin too much
- Fourth, don’t judge from the tiny preview. Zoom in on eyes, ears, teeth, and hairline. AI usually snitches on itself there
- Fifth, if one result is close, regenerate variations from that image instead of starting over
Also, weird tip: neutral expression often works better than smiling. Big smiles can make some models invent teeth lol.
@mikeappsreviewer and @yozora covered the upload side pretty well. I’d add this: stop chasing “perfect.” For profile pics, believable beats glamorous every time. If it looks a little boring but actually looks like you, that’s the win.
I’d check your expectations before your photo set. Slight disagreement with @yozora here: even with solid source photos, some generators still over-style faces and give that plastic HR-portal vibe.
What usually fixes it is post-selection, not just upload quality:
- Throw away 90 percent of outputs fast
- Keep only images that survive a zoom test
- Compare side by side with a real photo of you
- If friends say “that looks good” instead of “that looks like you,” reject it
One thing @hoshikuzu and @mikeappsreviewer touched on indirectly: consistency matters, but so does restraint. Don’t ask for “cinematic,” “luxury,” and “professional” together. Pick boring. Boring wins for profile photos.
If you want a simple tool, Eltima AI Headshot Generator is easy to test.
Pros:
- fast workflow
- decent style presets
- easy for non-editors
Cons:
- some outputs can look over-retouched
My rule: if you wouldn’t feel comfortable using it on LinkedIn at full size, regenerate. Believable beats impressive every time.